Facebook

Login

Support Sailonline

If you haven't already - join the SAILONLINE YACHT CLUB!

Please also consider making a donation - all amounts are greatly appreciated!

Board » General Discussion » Router Shootout - Software Test (Review)

Page: 1 2 Next

Posted by
Exmeromotu


Users avatar

Posts
71
Registered at
2008-12-10 15:22:17
2010-07-15 18:47:38 - Router Shootout - Software Test (Review)
Hi!

I decided to do a "Test Drive" of some well known and readily available Software Routing Programs. This is MY perspective of Sailplanner, Expedition, and Bluewater Racing, and criticism of any kind to my comments is more than welcome. I'm no authority on routing software, just a regular guy tring to sort things out. The purpose of this test was to see how they stack up against each other and point out some of their pros and cons. The course utilized for the test is the upcoming Ouzo Rally, the polar file (First 407 basic txt file) and the grib file (weather_36_global_gfs_20100715_1138.grb) used are the ones from brainaid's site. So all programs are "fed" with the same data. As far as I know Sailplanner's weather provider is the same as SOL, with the caveat that SP's weather is interpolated in a different manner from SOL's weather, so we are not using the same grib file for SP's routing but it should be close. All polar files are EXACTLY the same. All races were started at the same time 7/15/2010 12 UTC. So with all the aforementioned caveats, lets get to the nitty gritty.

Sailplanner (www.sailplanner.net) in my opinion is the easiest one to use, but that user friendliness comes at the price of flexibility and a few advanced features. First in SP you don't have the freedom to choose your grib files, they are dowloaded directly from sailport's server for the area of the world where your course is. Setting up waypoints in SP is pretty straightforward as it will parse almost any format of degrees minutes and seconds which is pretty cool, and its graphical user interface beats the others in my opinion. As usual on the first try SP will route over land, then it will remove any gridpoints that are over land and proceed to re-route. See attached pictures. For the Ouzo Rally course SP gave a ETA of 7/16/2010 02:50 UTC roughly 14.8 hours. One thing SP sorely needs is to have the ability to output the routing results into a text file, and the ability to save prior routes. When comparing the attached pictures you will see that SP is up to par with the other two programs, specially when routing around land.

I got a 30 day trial license for Expedition (www.iexpedition.org), the program costs a whooping $1,250.00 US. During the trial period you can test all the features of the program, it is NOT a watered down version. Most of these features apply to short course stuff which we don't use on SOL. Setting up waypoints is not as intuitive as SP but its not that bad once you get used to it. Since Sailplanner's Ultra High resolution grid longest dimension was roughly 1.2 nm I set Expedition to a routing resolution of 1.0 nm. On its first try Expedition quickly routed above land, (as expected), even when selecting the avoid land option!! For the second try I added some exclusion zones (i.e. land) and this time Expedition gave an acceptable route with an ETA of 7/16/2010 02:42 UTC (14 hours 42 minutes 38 seconds).

Bluewater Racing is freely available from www.bluewaterracing.com . It's not as user friendly as Sailplanner, so I suggest you thoroughly read the manual (twice) before starting to fiddle around with it. Once the waypoints were setup I proceeded to optimize the route with a time resolution of 0.1667 hours (10 minutes which is the same as SP) a grid size of 1 nm, a distance resolution of 60.0 nm (default) which refers to some flat earth approximation mumbo jumbo... and a Max Range of 10 nm (tells the program the allowance for the longest section of routing). As expected it routed over land. Getting Bluewater to not route over land is harder than in Expedition or Sailplanner. A few marks (one at Vouliagmeni, one at Charakas) had to be put into place to force Bluewater into an acceptable route. The output on the 2nd try (blue route) was suspect, since the prior route (red) favored a more northerly approach to Kythnos. I added a couple more marks, one at southern Kea and one at northwestern Kythnos. This 3rd optimization gave a slightly faster route (purple route) than the blue route with a northerly approach to Kythnos. The Blue Route had an ETA of 7/16/2010 03:06 UTC, the Purple Route had an ETA of 7/16/2010 02:53 UTC for the sake of comparison, the Red Route (useless since it goes over land) had an ETA of 7/16/2010 02:49 UTC.

Other observations

It seems to me that Expeditions weather interpolation scheme is the one that most closely resembles SOL's weather interpolation. All of these programs are intended as IRL tools so why doesn't Sailport use this same interpolation scheme on Sailplanner is beyond me. Sailplanner and Expedition automatically compute the best VMG angles for upwind and downwind from polar data. Bluewater doesn't. In Bluewater you have to TELL the program which are the best VMG angles for pure upwind and pure downwind for each windspeed. The second entry on each line of polar data tells Bluewater which is the best upwind VMG angle. The second to last entry on each line of polar data assigns the best downwind VMG angle. From the polar file we can see that Bluewater thinks that 52 degrees is the best upwind VMG angle for all windspeeds and 150 degrees is the best downwind VMG angle. Experience tells us that is is totally wrong. Is this the reason for the highly suspect blue route? I think so, but more on that later.

Conclusion

All of these programs will give pretty much the same output given the same data. The uncertainty on the next weather forecast is greater than the differences in output from one program to the next. So anyone using these tools will get decent results as long as they don't blindly accept the output. I usually treat the output as if it were wrong, I analyze it and if the analysis makes sense, then I trust it.
Attachments
Posted by
sol


Users avatar

Posts
298
Registered at
2008-08-14 11:08:14
2010-07-16 05:34:36 - Re: Router Shootout - Software Test (Review)
Hi Exmeromotu,

I use prettier colours for my routing :)
Attached is an example.......
Attachments
Posted by
NZL_undercover


Users avatar

Posts
65
Registered at
2009-07-31 03:29:32
2010-07-16 05:36:58 - Re: Router Shootout - Software Test (Review)
No you dont sol........NZL_undercover does
Posted by
Exmeromotu


Users avatar

Posts
71
Registered at
2008-12-10 15:22:17
2010-07-17 18:27:18 - Re: Router Shootout - Software Test (Review)
Here is a race day followup to the Software Test:

Sailplanner has an ETA of 7/17/2010 22:07 UTC

Bluewater;

All the routes pictured in Bluewater are within 1 minute of each other. I played around with the grid dimensions to see if I could get it to route without going over land. I finally did (Red Route) with a grid dimension of 0.25 nm! No additional marks to "force" the route were necessary. I also fine tuned the polar data so that the program knows which are the optimum VMG angles. ETA's range between 7/17/2010 22:01 UTC and 22:02 UTC

Expedition:

I drew some exclusion areas (land) utilizing the coast profiles from the SOL chart. ETA is 7/17/2010 21:59 UTC using the middle of the line as finish point. The three legs from Kythnos to Paros are for the different arrival points.

Conclusion:

Once I fine tuned Bluewater's polar file and grid dimensions I could get it to route avoiding land. So all the software programs could handle the land obstacles decently, albeit with some user help. Sailplanner needed the least user input as far as land avoidance is concerned. Expedition needed the most user input to avoid land, and Bluewater was somewhere in between since you had to fiddle around with grid dimensions. It should be noted that all these programs use different Charts with different coastline resolutions, so the routing over land problem would take a whole new perspective if we were doing this race IRL. Once again all software programs give more than decent results their differences resulting in mainly the way they interpolate the weather. Some human intervention is needed in all of them to fine tune results.

On a "Price/Performance Ratio" well Bluewater is free , Sailplanner costs $89.00 and Expedition costs $1,250.00.

On a "User friendliness/Performance Ratio" I would rate Sailplanner first, Expedition second and Bluewater third. Expedition and Bluewater have more flexibility and features than Sailplanner though. Attached are Race day pics enjoy.
Attachments
Posted by
76Trombones


Users avatar

Posts
362
Registered at
2009-08-03 18:04:56
2010-07-17 19:28:44 - Re: Router Shootout - Software Test (Review)
In software that supports it, a "trick" that's a good look into what is going on for those wanting to learn from the software: Instead of routing to both ends/middle of the finish, turn on forward-isochrones for a visual representation of the fastest target.

This works even when the line is long and an intermediate point may be fastest.
Posted by
Exmeromotu


Users avatar

Posts
71
Registered at
2008-12-10 15:22:17
2010-07-17 20:27:12 - Re: Router Shootout - Software Test (Review)
Cool Trick! Didn't think of it. I was doing it "the hard way", nevertheless, I was aiming for the "fastest point" of the line, and the Isochrone trick confirmed it!! Nice!!
Posted by
Exmeromotu


Users avatar

Posts
71
Registered at
2008-12-10 15:22:17
2010-07-17 22:36:52 - Re: Router Shootout - Software Test (Review)
For those interested...

I raced the Ouzo race completely on DC's (no human interviention) using Expedition. I didn't hit land and I arrived 3 seconds earlier than scheduled... however 39 boats sailed faster than I did. The top boats beat me by 30 seconds!!

Granted, it was a short race and not very router friendly (lots of obstacles) but nevertheless, a pad, pencil & longhand calcs with a little bit of knowhow will produce awesome results too!!
Posted by
Joshua_Pig


Users avatar

Posts
22
Registered at
2009-09-25 16:58:15
2010-07-18 15:42:04 - Re: Router Shootout - Software Test (Review)
Thank you Exmer for sharing with us this interesting comparison :)
Posted by
Schakel


Users avatar

Posts
183
Registered at
2008-12-19 09:19:00
2010-07-19 10:47:54 - Re: Router Shootout - Software Test (Review)
Exmeromotu said @ 2010-07-17 22:36:52:
I raced the Ouzo race completely on DC's (no human interviention) using Expedition.
(Unquote)


I'll do you one better: racing the Scurry timed race on 1 manually entered command, one to get the boat going. All other commands are input by a tool. Can you guess?

Philip
Attachments
Posted by
Exmeromotu


Users avatar

Posts
71
Registered at
2008-12-10 15:22:17
2010-07-19 13:04:11 - Re: Router Shootout - Software Test (Review)
Looks pretty slick Schakel! Cool!

Page: 1 2 Next

Please login to post a reply.

Races

Next Race: 00d 00h 00m

Current Races:

Cape Town to Rio 2026

Welcome to South Africa and RCYC's classic transatlantic Cape2Rio Race from Cape Town, South Africa, to Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. First run in 1971, this run is buddied with the IRL, Cape2Rio 2025 arranged by the Royal Cape Yacht Club with the cooperation of the
Iate Clube do Rio de Janeiro Despite this being announced the 2025 race (starting dec. 27) it is the 2026 SOL championship kickoff. This virtual version, will be raced once again in Mark Mills' 74ft speedster, the stunning C2R74.
Race #1996 INFO
by brainaid.de
C2R74 PARTICULARS
WX Updates:
0430 / 1030 / 1630 / 2230
Ranking:
OCQ1 - OCCH - SUPBUD - SYC
Race starts: Dec 27th 12:00 Registration Open!

▶ Flash
GO TO RACE

ORCV Melbourne to Hobart 2025

Welcome to the legendary Westcoaster, a true test of endurance and seamanship that’s challenged sailors for over 50 years! Spanning 435 nautical miles, this iconic race takes the fleet from Melbourne, across the wild Bass Strait, and around Tasmania’s rugged west coast to Hobart. Organized by the Ocean Racing Club of Victoria, this year our SOLers will be racing the sleek and powerful Dehler 46—a fast, elegant regatta cruiser built for both speed and adventure. Get ready for an unforgettable offshore classic!
Race #1952
INFO by brainaid.de
Dehler 46 PARTICULARS
WX Updates:
0430 / 1030 / 1630 / 2230
Ranking: SYC
Race starts: Dec 27th 02:30 Registration Open!
▶ Flash
GO TO RACE

Tasman Double 2025 - Sydney to Hobart

Christmas in Summer? Indeed! Kick off the first leg of our two-leg Tasman Double series in the classic 625nm Sydney to Hobart race, this year in the upgraded SuperMaxi 100v2. Inspired by Neville Crichton’s legendary Alfa Romeo II and her near-sister Wild Oats XI, these yachts blaze across online and real-world waters alike. Feel the thrill even in storm-force winds as you tackle the Tasman Sea—dock in Hobart victorious, or at least in time for a well-earned post-Christmas drink!
Race #1953
INFO by brainaid.de
Super Maxi 100v2 PARTICULARS
WX Updates:
0430 / 1030 / 1630 / 2230
Ranking: TD - SYC
Race starts: Dec 26th 02:00 Registration Open!
▶ Flash
GO TO RACE

Valletta Sprint 2025


We invite you once again to this SOL classic around the Middle Sea, departing from and returning to historic Valletta. Loseley modelled on an IRL classic often sponsored by a luxury wristwatch purveyor, our c 600nm course takes us north as far as Stromboli, then west of Sicily and south to Lampedusa and back to Valletta probably via the strait between Malta and Gozo. This year we will race it all in very Meddy Dufour 40’s!
Race #1949
INFO by brainaid.de
Dufour 40 PARTICULARS
WX Updates:
0430 / 1030 / 1630 / 2230
Ranking: SYC
RACE CLOSE: Monday,
December 29 at 2300 UTC.
Race starts: Dec 20th 11:00 Registration Open!
▶ Flash
GO TO RACE

Chatham Island TIMED Chase 2025

The final TIMED race of 2025 takes us to the isolated and mysterious Chatham Islands archipelago 430 nm east of New Zealand’s South Island. There promises to be plenty of breeze from every point on the compass as we sail the Farr 38 around Chatham Island, Pitt Island, and The Forty Fours on this 124 nm course. This is a TIMEDrace so you may RE-REGISTER HEREto try again after finishing a run. You will have 13 days and 11 hours to test your skill and decision making after the race opens.
Race #1990
INFOby brainaid.de
Farr 38 Particulars
WX Updates:
0430 / 1030 / 1630 / 2230
Ranking:
TRQ4 - TRCH - SUPSOL - SYC
RACE CLOSE: Saturday,
27 December at 23:00 UTC
Race starts: Dec 14th 12:00 Registration Open!
▶ Flash
GO TO RACE

Christmas to Christmas Island 2025

Two waypoints, start and finish, and between them 5827 NM of two oceans. Not much time if we want to sit at the Christmas Eve table. You will need to maintain an average speed of over 10 knots, maybe quite possible with this Maxi Trimaran, but prepare your vessel well and choose the best of the many possible routes. Hands up everyone who knew there were TWO Christmas Islands?! OK, maybe you have sailed this Sailonline course before... but it's time to get ready for the 2025 challenge of racing between Christmas Island in the Pacific to Christmas Island in the Indian Ocean! It also marks the conclusion of our prestigious Ocean Race Championship 2025. Please have fun! Fair winds!
PRIZE: SMPF
Race #1967
INFO by brainaid.de
Maxi Trimaran PARTICULARS
WX Updates:
0430 / 1030 / 1630 / 2230
Ranking: OCQ4 - OCCH - SUPSOL - SYC
RACE CLOSE: Wednesday,
December 24 at 2300 UTC.
Race starts: Dec 01st 11:00 Registration Closed
▶ Flash
GO TO RACE

Go to race archive

SYC Ranking

  1. Sailonline Yacht Club Member KaSToR
  2. Sailonline Yacht Club Member WRmirekd
  3. Sailonline Yacht Club Member CriticalHippo
  4. Sailonline Yacht Club Member rafa
  5. Sailonline Yacht Club Member bonknhoot
  6. Sailonline Yacht Club Member vida
  7. Sailonline Yacht Club Member CollegeFund
  8. Sailonline Yacht Club Member Sax747
  9. Sailonline Yacht Club Member pepsPV5
  10. Sailonline Yacht Club Member Panpyc

View full list

Series

Mobile Client

SYC members have the benefit of access to our mobile/lightweight web client!

The mobile client