Facebook

Login

Support Sailonline

If you haven't already - join the SAILONLINE YACHT CLUB!

Please also consider making a donation - all amounts are greatly appreciated!

Board » General Discussion » Router Shootout - Software Test (Review)

Page: 1 2 Next

Posted by
Exmeromotu


Users avatar

Posts
71
Registered at
2008-12-10 15:22:17
2010-07-15 18:47:38 - Router Shootout - Software Test (Review)
Hi!

I decided to do a "Test Drive" of some well known and readily available Software Routing Programs. This is MY perspective of Sailplanner, Expedition, and Bluewater Racing, and criticism of any kind to my comments is more than welcome. I'm no authority on routing software, just a regular guy tring to sort things out. The purpose of this test was to see how they stack up against each other and point out some of their pros and cons. The course utilized for the test is the upcoming Ouzo Rally, the polar file (First 407 basic txt file) and the grib file (weather_36_global_gfs_20100715_1138.grb) used are the ones from brainaid's site. So all programs are "fed" with the same data. As far as I know Sailplanner's weather provider is the same as SOL, with the caveat that SP's weather is interpolated in a different manner from SOL's weather, so we are not using the same grib file for SP's routing but it should be close. All polar files are EXACTLY the same. All races were started at the same time 7/15/2010 12 UTC. So with all the aforementioned caveats, lets get to the nitty gritty.

Sailplanner (www.sailplanner.net) in my opinion is the easiest one to use, but that user friendliness comes at the price of flexibility and a few advanced features. First in SP you don't have the freedom to choose your grib files, they are dowloaded directly from sailport's server for the area of the world where your course is. Setting up waypoints in SP is pretty straightforward as it will parse almost any format of degrees minutes and seconds which is pretty cool, and its graphical user interface beats the others in my opinion. As usual on the first try SP will route over land, then it will remove any gridpoints that are over land and proceed to re-route. See attached pictures. For the Ouzo Rally course SP gave a ETA of 7/16/2010 02:50 UTC roughly 14.8 hours. One thing SP sorely needs is to have the ability to output the routing results into a text file, and the ability to save prior routes. When comparing the attached pictures you will see that SP is up to par with the other two programs, specially when routing around land.

I got a 30 day trial license for Expedition (www.iexpedition.org), the program costs a whooping $1,250.00 US. During the trial period you can test all the features of the program, it is NOT a watered down version. Most of these features apply to short course stuff which we don't use on SOL. Setting up waypoints is not as intuitive as SP but its not that bad once you get used to it. Since Sailplanner's Ultra High resolution grid longest dimension was roughly 1.2 nm I set Expedition to a routing resolution of 1.0 nm. On its first try Expedition quickly routed above land, (as expected), even when selecting the avoid land option!! For the second try I added some exclusion zones (i.e. land) and this time Expedition gave an acceptable route with an ETA of 7/16/2010 02:42 UTC (14 hours 42 minutes 38 seconds).

Bluewater Racing is freely available from www.bluewaterracing.com . It's not as user friendly as Sailplanner, so I suggest you thoroughly read the manual (twice) before starting to fiddle around with it. Once the waypoints were setup I proceeded to optimize the route with a time resolution of 0.1667 hours (10 minutes which is the same as SP) a grid size of 1 nm, a distance resolution of 60.0 nm (default) which refers to some flat earth approximation mumbo jumbo... and a Max Range of 10 nm (tells the program the allowance for the longest section of routing). As expected it routed over land. Getting Bluewater to not route over land is harder than in Expedition or Sailplanner. A few marks (one at Vouliagmeni, one at Charakas) had to be put into place to force Bluewater into an acceptable route. The output on the 2nd try (blue route) was suspect, since the prior route (red) favored a more northerly approach to Kythnos. I added a couple more marks, one at southern Kea and one at northwestern Kythnos. This 3rd optimization gave a slightly faster route (purple route) than the blue route with a northerly approach to Kythnos. The Blue Route had an ETA of 7/16/2010 03:06 UTC, the Purple Route had an ETA of 7/16/2010 02:53 UTC for the sake of comparison, the Red Route (useless since it goes over land) had an ETA of 7/16/2010 02:49 UTC.

Other observations

It seems to me that Expeditions weather interpolation scheme is the one that most closely resembles SOL's weather interpolation. All of these programs are intended as IRL tools so why doesn't Sailport use this same interpolation scheme on Sailplanner is beyond me. Sailplanner and Expedition automatically compute the best VMG angles for upwind and downwind from polar data. Bluewater doesn't. In Bluewater you have to TELL the program which are the best VMG angles for pure upwind and pure downwind for each windspeed. The second entry on each line of polar data tells Bluewater which is the best upwind VMG angle. The second to last entry on each line of polar data assigns the best downwind VMG angle. From the polar file we can see that Bluewater thinks that 52 degrees is the best upwind VMG angle for all windspeeds and 150 degrees is the best downwind VMG angle. Experience tells us that is is totally wrong. Is this the reason for the highly suspect blue route? I think so, but more on that later.

Conclusion

All of these programs will give pretty much the same output given the same data. The uncertainty on the next weather forecast is greater than the differences in output from one program to the next. So anyone using these tools will get decent results as long as they don't blindly accept the output. I usually treat the output as if it were wrong, I analyze it and if the analysis makes sense, then I trust it.
Attachments
Posted by
sol


Users avatar

Posts
300
Registered at
2008-08-14 11:08:14
2010-07-16 05:34:36 - Re: Router Shootout - Software Test (Review)
Hi Exmeromotu,

I use prettier colours for my routing :)
Attached is an example.......
Attachments
Posted by
NZL_undercover


Users avatar

Posts
65
Registered at
2009-07-31 03:29:32
2010-07-16 05:36:58 - Re: Router Shootout - Software Test (Review)
No you dont sol........NZL_undercover does
Posted by
Exmeromotu


Users avatar

Posts
71
Registered at
2008-12-10 15:22:17
2010-07-17 18:27:18 - Re: Router Shootout - Software Test (Review)
Here is a race day followup to the Software Test:

Sailplanner has an ETA of 7/17/2010 22:07 UTC

Bluewater;

All the routes pictured in Bluewater are within 1 minute of each other. I played around with the grid dimensions to see if I could get it to route without going over land. I finally did (Red Route) with a grid dimension of 0.25 nm! No additional marks to "force" the route were necessary. I also fine tuned the polar data so that the program knows which are the optimum VMG angles. ETA's range between 7/17/2010 22:01 UTC and 22:02 UTC

Expedition:

I drew some exclusion areas (land) utilizing the coast profiles from the SOL chart. ETA is 7/17/2010 21:59 UTC using the middle of the line as finish point. The three legs from Kythnos to Paros are for the different arrival points.

Conclusion:

Once I fine tuned Bluewater's polar file and grid dimensions I could get it to route avoiding land. So all the software programs could handle the land obstacles decently, albeit with some user help. Sailplanner needed the least user input as far as land avoidance is concerned. Expedition needed the most user input to avoid land, and Bluewater was somewhere in between since you had to fiddle around with grid dimensions. It should be noted that all these programs use different Charts with different coastline resolutions, so the routing over land problem would take a whole new perspective if we were doing this race IRL. Once again all software programs give more than decent results their differences resulting in mainly the way they interpolate the weather. Some human intervention is needed in all of them to fine tune results.

On a "Price/Performance Ratio" well Bluewater is free , Sailplanner costs $89.00 and Expedition costs $1,250.00.

On a "User friendliness/Performance Ratio" I would rate Sailplanner first, Expedition second and Bluewater third. Expedition and Bluewater have more flexibility and features than Sailplanner though. Attached are Race day pics enjoy.
Attachments
Posted by
76Trombones


Users avatar

Posts
362
Registered at
2009-08-03 18:04:56
2010-07-17 19:28:44 - Re: Router Shootout - Software Test (Review)
In software that supports it, a "trick" that's a good look into what is going on for those wanting to learn from the software: Instead of routing to both ends/middle of the finish, turn on forward-isochrones for a visual representation of the fastest target.

This works even when the line is long and an intermediate point may be fastest.
Posted by
Exmeromotu


Users avatar

Posts
71
Registered at
2008-12-10 15:22:17
2010-07-17 20:27:12 - Re: Router Shootout - Software Test (Review)
Cool Trick! Didn't think of it. I was doing it "the hard way", nevertheless, I was aiming for the "fastest point" of the line, and the Isochrone trick confirmed it!! Nice!!
Posted by
Exmeromotu


Users avatar

Posts
71
Registered at
2008-12-10 15:22:17
2010-07-17 22:36:52 - Re: Router Shootout - Software Test (Review)
For those interested...

I raced the Ouzo race completely on DC's (no human interviention) using Expedition. I didn't hit land and I arrived 3 seconds earlier than scheduled... however 39 boats sailed faster than I did. The top boats beat me by 30 seconds!!

Granted, it was a short race and not very router friendly (lots of obstacles) but nevertheless, a pad, pencil & longhand calcs with a little bit of knowhow will produce awesome results too!!
Posted by
Joshua_Pig


Users avatar

Posts
22
Registered at
2009-09-25 16:58:15
2010-07-18 15:42:04 - Re: Router Shootout - Software Test (Review)
Thank you Exmer for sharing with us this interesting comparison :)
Posted by
Schakel


Users avatar

Posts
183
Registered at
2008-12-19 09:19:00
2010-07-19 10:47:54 - Re: Router Shootout - Software Test (Review)
Exmeromotu said @ 2010-07-17 22:36:52:
I raced the Ouzo race completely on DC's (no human interviention) using Expedition.
(Unquote)


I'll do you one better: racing the Scurry timed race on 1 manually entered command, one to get the boat going. All other commands are input by a tool. Can you guess?

Philip
Attachments
Posted by
Exmeromotu


Users avatar

Posts
71
Registered at
2008-12-10 15:22:17
2010-07-19 13:04:11 - Re: Router Shootout - Software Test (Review)
Looks pretty slick Schakel! Cool!

Page: 1 2 Next

Please login to post a reply.

Races

Next Race: 00d 00h 00m

Current Races:

The British Isles Circumnavigation 2026


The British Isles Circumnavigation is here! Inviting skippers to take on an epic 1,720nm clockwise voyage around Britain and Ireland! Starting and finishing in Cowes, the course passes some of the most iconic landmarks in offshore sailing, including Fastnet Rock, Tearaght Lighthouse, Black Rock, St. Kilda and Muckle Flugga before the long run home. Racing in our fast and versatile TP52, this Super-Buddy Championship race will reward smart routing, changing weather strategy and sustained concentration over every mile. Good luck!
Race #2052
INFO by brainaid.de
TP-52 PARTICULARS
WX Updates:
0430 / 1030 / 1630 / 2230
Ranking: SUPBUD - SYC
Race starts: Aug 09th 10:00 Registration Open!
▶ Flash
GO TO RACE

SSANZ Triple Series 2026 - Race 2

Welcome back to race two of the SSANZ Triple Series—it's time for the Lewmar 100! Our dynamic fleet of Young 88s returns for another exhilarating 65 nautical mile battle across the stunning waters off Auckland, New Zealand. Once again, our skilled Sailonline racers will test their strategic minds and endurance. With intense competition, shifting conditions, and plenty of tactical decision-making, this race promises high-energy sailing and edge-of-your-seat excitement from start to finish!
Race #2047
INFO by brainaid.de
Young 88 PARTICULARS
WX Updates:
0430 / 1030 / 1630 / 2230
Ranking: SSANZ - SUPBUD - SYC
RACE CLOSE: Friday,
August 14 at 2300 UTC.
Race starts: Aug 08th 21:15 Registration Open!
▶ Flash
GO TO RACE

Lake Vättern PYOC 2026


Back in 2013, longstanding SOLer Musigny and his friend xthyra invited us for a three race tour of beautiful Lake Vättern in the heart of southern Sweden. After many years, we return there for a quick sprint from a start in front of the village of Brandstorp, either way around Visingso island in the middle of the lake, but PORT HAND ROUND a buoy off the Granna piers on the eastern shore and back, once again avoiding Visingso as best you can. At least 20nm in trusty Scandinavian 11m One Designs; good luck!
Race #2046
INFO by brainaid.de
11m OD PARTICULARS
WX Updates:
0430 / 1030 / 1630 / 2230
Ranking: SPQ3 - SPCH - SYC
RACE CLOSE: Wednesday,
August 12 at 2300 UTC.
Race starts: Aug 08th 21:00 Registration Open!
▶ Flash
GO TO RACE

Easter Island to Tristan da Cunha 2026

Welcome to the second leg of our RNW series, rounding Cape Horn. This middle-most leg Round the New World, from Easter Island to Tristan da Cunha, is also part of our Ocean Championship, and as such the second race of OCQ3 2026. This race, like the previous race in the RNW series, will be sailed in our revised 'version 2' Imoca 60 Foil. Race #2050
INFO by brainaid.de
Imoca 60 Foil v2 PARTICULARS
WX Updates:
0430 / 1030 / 1630 / 2230
Ranking: OCQ3 - RNW - OCCH - SYC
Race starts: Aug 03rd 11:00 Registration Open!
▶ Flash
GO TO RACE

Go to race archive

SYC Ranking

  1. Sailonline Yacht Club Member KaSToR
  2. Sailonline Yacht Club Member WRmirekd
  3. Sailonline Yacht Club Member CriticalHippo
  4. Sailonline Yacht Club Member Panpyc
  5. Sailonline Yacht Club Member rafa
  6. Sailonline Yacht Club Member cdhinman
  7. Sailonline Yacht Club Member ms0689
  8. Sailonline Yacht Club Member BRENTGRAY
  9. Sailonline Yacht Club Member rthinman
  10. Sailonline Yacht Club Member Sax747

View full list

Series

Mobile Client

SYC members have the benefit of access to our mobile/lightweight web client!

The mobile client