Sailonline.org - Online Sailing

Facebook

Login

Support Sailonline

If you haven't already - join the SAILONLINE YACHT CLUB!

Please also consider making a donation - all amounts are greatly appreciated!

Tweets by @sailonline

Board » Technical Discussion » Performance loss

Page: First Previous 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next

Posted by kroppyer Posts 346 Registered at 2010-02-05 15:25:55	2014-07-18 15:02:50 - Re: Performance loss
	rod, Starting at 100%, a loss of 8% is achieved by With tack or gybe: Tack to an angle that gives sog=16 kts, more speed is more performance loss. (the angle depends on polar and tws) Without: Turn 110 degrees. Greater angle is more performance loss. For more complicated things (not starting with 100%, or doing more than one manouvre) please refer to the PDF I posted earlier in this thread. --- Last Edited by kroppyer at 2014-07-18 15:04:28 ---
Posted by dtayls Posts 29 Registered at 2014-06-23 03:34:16	2014-08-15 04:30:08 - Re: Performance loss
	Wow! Great thread. I've raced for almost 40 years and I'm an engineer & a computer scientist, so this one's right up my alley. Having just read through the whole thread here are a few thoughts from me is not particular order: 1. SOL started with a realistic model and that should probably remain. Anything that breaks with realism should be explained, at the very least. 2. There are good real-world reasons for deaparting from the realistic model. Server load and reasonable sample rates need to be considered. 3. Different yachts recover differently so how you should sail each yacht should be different. 4. The world is changing quickly. Downwind-flyers come on and off the plane and their performance changes massively when this happens. If a boat is only just on the plane then a gybe will be costly. 5. And don't even talk about foiling and whether you can keep it up during a tack/gybe!!! I suspect the SOL models are based on displacement vessels. It's probably time for an update particularly given that we're playing with some pretty impressive craft these days.
Posted by dtayls Posts 29 Registered at 2014-06-23 03:34:16	2014-08-15 06:24:08 - Re: Performance loss
	I should also mention that I was impressed by some of the analytical work. Excellent stuff. This reminds me of a marketing subject I did around 20 years ago at university. A key component was a computerized marketing strategy game. In our group we analyzed the 'black box' of the game so well that after the results were published the lecturer bailed me up and accused me of cheating ... Let me just say "I like your work."
Posted by kroppyer Posts 346 Registered at 2010-02-05 15:25:55	2014-08-15 09:45:59 - Re: Performance loss
	I made this yesterday: Sailonline Performance Calculator http://sol.kroppyer.nl/performance/ It's about the same as the spreadsheet I posted earlier, but this one is more precise. Only time lost to next DC is not always accurate (because there is no clear definition for "time lost"). dtayls, funny that you read and posted on this thread just after I finished the calculator. Of course a new model would still be simplified reality, heavily simplified. But it's not hard to make a model that's more realistic than the current one, with the current model I fail to see the relation with reality. You might see some worked out propositions for new models over here fairly soon.
Posted by dtayls Posts 29 Registered at 2014-06-23 03:34:16	2014-08-16 01:24:32 - Re: Performance loss
	Kroppy, Some SOLers are sailors while others are not. It is probably true to say that most sailors want the model to be ultra-realistic while SOLers just want a model (aka. rules of the game) that they can understand and play against. I personally think there is a middle ground that will probably work for everyone ... if implemented and explained properly. The 15 second sample/update interval is an interesting aspect of the game. I am sure there are many reasons for this - server load and UI development requirements are just two that come to mind. But let's face it, this is not an online shoot-em-up game and people should probably not be trying to sail these things in real time. And if you want to play with a high performance yacht and really know how to tack/gybe on the plane/foil then get out on the water and do it IRL! But that said, I think there is a lot of value to be had in changing some parts of the model and most of these are probably quite straight forward to implement. Dtayls.
Posted by HappyHour Posts 27 Registered at 2009-01-08 06:48:51	2014-10-02 01:47:42 - Performance loss with high speed boats
	A performance model hasnt to be realistic but it should work. Our current model works with slow boats ( max speed 15kn ), of course far from perfect but it works. It doesnt work well with faster boats (max speed 15+ kn). With a AC72 it just gets crazy. For example: Gybe sailing downwind with 40kn speed at 92% performance, hurrah, no performance lost. Doing the same at 94% performance, oops, performance drops to 74%. Thats not just unrealistic. thats stupid! Isnt the 93% rule outdated, a rule from history when the max speed was around 14kn? Why dont we drop the 93% rule, let all performance calculations as it is and set hard limits, like max perf loss 90%. Maybe even better: Divide our fleet into "slow" and "fast" and set differrent max performance lost limits, like 88% for the fast boats and 93% for the slow boats. IMHO it should be possilbe to implement these changes to our server software. Just an idea.
Posted by kroppyer Posts 346 Registered at 2010-02-05 15:25:55	2014-10-02 08:48:53 - Re: Performance loss
	I fully agree that performance loss needs an update. To say the least I really disagree on the idea that performance should be different across the fleet. First of all I like the beauty of everyone is exactly equal too much. Second, why would the people with less practise be faster in manoeuvres than the people with more practise? [edit: I misunderstood the idea] --- If it's going to happen, should we try a "do it once and to it good" approach, or should we spend some time on an intermediate performance system as "quick fix"? --- Last Edited by kroppyer at 2014-10-02 15:55:39 ---
Posted by HappyHour Posts 27 Registered at 2009-01-08 06:48:51	2014-10-02 12:43:18 - Re: Performance loss
	when i was talking about fleet, i didnt mean the boats in a single race. I meant the diff between a "slow" yacht like first 40.7 and "Racing machines" like VO4 or our latest baby AC72. Our fleet of available boats. From 6.5m upto 90m. --- Last Edited by HappyHour at 2014-10-02 12:48:49 --- --- Last Edited by HappyHour at 2014-10-02 14:04:02 --- --- Last Edited by HappyHour at 2014-10-02 14:06:05 ---
Posted by kroppyer Posts 346 Registered at 2010-02-05 15:25:55	2014-10-02 15:54:33 - Re: Performance loss
	Ah! I misunderstood. Now I fully agree: the performance system should depend on the boat type. A very simple solution would be as I described a few posts back and use the weight of a boat for the performance calculation.
Posted by HappyHour Posts 27 Registered at 2009-01-08 06:48:51	2014-10-07 15:56:46 - Re: Performance loss
	"or should we spend some time on an intermediate performance system as "quick fix"?" If some time means some hours, we should do the "quick and dirty fix". As i said in my previous posting, let all the calculations as it is and set a hard limit for the max. performance drop. that would at least eliminate the worst impacts of our current perf system. Today i sailed 2 runs with a fast boat in the Atlantic Circle and tried to beat the performance drop system and it seems to work. A 3 step tacking, like from 45 twa to -5 twa, -20 twa and -45 twa may be faster then a normal tacking from 45 twa to -45 twa. The same with gybing. Gybe to the slowest possible speed to minimize the performance loss. Anything will be better than a 34kn speed to 34kn speed gybe with a 17% perf loss at 94% performance. A nice tactical aspect, but im sure this isnt what the developers had in mind when they wrote our current code. --- Last Edited by HappyHour at 2014-10-07 16:23:31 ---

Page: First Previous 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next

Please login to post a reply.

Races

Next Race: 00d 00h 00m

Current Races:

Manilla to Calbayog 2024

After six years, we welcome you to the race created by sassy63 for the second time. He takes us to the Philippines to race around islands on a 380 nm course. We sail the Italia 14.98 and in Calbayog we'll enjoy our well-deserved Palatan dish and drink it with San Miguel.
Race #1803
INFO from brainaid.de
Italia 14.98 PARTICULARS
WX Updates:
0430 / 1030 / 1630 / 2230
Ranking:
ARQ2 - ARCH - SUPSOL - SYC
Race starts: Apr 22nd 17:00 Registration Open!

▶ Flash

GO TO RACE

Jakob's Birthday BBQ Race 2024

Sailonline had two founders and Jakob, the more senior of the two, has his birthday in April which we always like to celebrate with a race through the Stockholm Archipelago from Revengegrundet Lighthouse to his mooring at Baggensfjärden. Traditionally also, like other celebrations this time of year, this feast has been “moveable”, so on this occasion we will be racing on a Wednesday in one of our latest high-performance 40-footers, the Carkeek 40. Please join us then for this always tricky 30nm race. Grattis på födelsedagen Jakob!
Race #1794
INFO by brainaid.de
Carkeek 40 PARTICULARS
WX Updates:
0430 / 1030 / 1630 / 2230
Ranking: SYC
RACE CLOSE: Wednesday,
April 24 at 2300 UTC.
Race starts: Apr 20th 14:00 Registration Closed

▶ Flash

GO TO RACE

Melbourne to Osaka Prelude 2024

Welcome once again to what these days is Sailonline’s almost annual virtual Melbourne to Osaka Yacht Race. In real life, this double-handed 5500 nm race between these two sister cities, one deep in the southern hemisphere, the other high in the northern hemisphere, is run every four to five years, and is planned to be held again in 2025, so this race is a Prelude in partnership with the Melbourne Osaka Cup 2025 organising committee collaborating with the Ocean Racing Club of Victoria (ORCV), and the Sandringham (SYC) and Osaka Hokko (OHYC) yacht clubs. On this occasion, we’ll be racing the well-known First 40, a popular size of boat for a long-distance double-handed race. With the doldrums unavoidably lying across the track, you can expect to be at virtual sea for at least a month!
Race #1669
INFO by brainaid.de
First 40 Particulars
WX Updates:
0430 / 1030 / 1630 / 2230
Ranking: SYC
Race starts: Apr 20th 00:00 Registration Open!

▶ Flash

GO TO RACE

St Nazaire Chasse TIMED Race 2024

Welcome to a "chasse" (hunt) from St. Nazaire to La Baule on the west coast of France! This race was designed by SOLer FR_flouflou in 2010. The KER 40 was introduced to SOL in 2016 by SOLer psail, and the Sol-KER was a welcome addition to SOL’s fleet of 40- footers, as it was to the IRL Ker fleet of eponymous - like KERonimo, KukuKERchu and Ice BreaKER. This is a TIMEDrace, so you may RE-REGISTER HERE to try again, after finishing a run. You will have 13 days and 11 hours to show your skill and decision making after the race opens.
Race #1797
INFOby brainaid.de
Ker 40 PARTICULARS
WX Updates:
0430 / 1030 / 1630 / 2230
Ranking:
TRQ2 - TRCH - SUPSOL - SYC
RACE CLOSE: Saturday,
27 April at 23:00 UTC
Race starts: Apr 14th 12:00 Registration Open!

▶ Flash

GO TO RACE

Cape Town to Auckland 2024

Welcome to the second leg of this Round The World series 2024. It's also the April edition of this year's ocean race championship. The course is the same as the one sailed in 2023, but this year we sail the iconic Swan 65, as suggested in the concluding RTW race last year.
Prepare yourselves for an epic 30-day journey, navigating through the unpredictable waters of the South Seas. It's essential to take care of provisioning to ensure a smooth and enjoyable race experience. With the longer duration, we anticipate plenty of opportunities for camaraderie, competition, and unforgettable memories.
PRIZE: SMPF
Race# 1789
INFO from brainaid.de
Swan 65 PARTICULARS
WX updates:
0430 / 1030 / 1630 / 2230
Ranking: OCQ2 - RTW - OCCH - SUPSOL - SYC
Race starts: Apr 01st 11:00 Registration Closed

▶ Flash

GO TO RACE

Go to race archive

SYC Ranking

View full list

Series

Mobile Client

SYC members have the benefit of access to our mobile/lightweight web client!

The mobile client